Comparison of preferred frequency gain settings obtained with category rating and modified simplex procedure.

نویسندگان

  • F K Kuk
  • C Lau
چکیده

We examined the relations between the preferred frequency gain settings obtained from the modified simplex procedure and those that were rated highest during category rating at three speech and noise levels (speech and noise levels at 60/65, 63/63, 65/60, all in dBA). During category rating, subjects rated short discourse passages on a 7-point scale using clarity and noise interference as criteria. Clarity was used as criterion in the modified simplex procedure. Results indicated that most subjects gave the same high rating to two or more frequency gain settings during category rating. Such settings varied across subjects and test conditions. The preferred frequency gain settings selected with the modified simplex procedure matched closely those rated highest in clarify and lowest in noise interference. This suggests that the modified simplex procedure may be used to determine preferred frequency gain setting on a hearing aid.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Preferred frequency response for two- and three-channel amplification systems.

The purpose of these investigations was to compare the preferred frequency-gain responses obtained from two- and three-channel amplification systems. The current experiments were limited to a linear system in which the crossover frequency dividing the channels was systematically varied. The subjects for the experiment were nine individuals with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing lo...

متن کامل

Estimating Suspended Sediment by Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Decision Trees (DT) and Sediment Rating Curve (SRC) Models (Case study: Lorestan Province, Iran)

The aim of this study was to estimate suspended sediment by the ANN model, DT with CART algorithm and different types of SRC, in ten stations from the Lorestan Province of Iran. The results showed that the accuracy of ANN with Levenberg-Marquardt back propagation algorithm is more than the two other models, especially in high discharges. Comparison of different intervals in models showed that r...

متن کامل

Effect of hearing aid experience on preferred insertion gain selection.

The effect of hearing aid experience (measured as years of hearing aid use and user insertion gain at octave frequencies from 250 Hz to 4000 Hz) on the selection of preferred insertion gain under six listening conditions and one vocalization condition was examined. Thirteen experienced hearing aid users selected their preferred insertion gain in each test condition using a modified simplex proc...

متن کامل

An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.

BACKGROUND Johnson and Dillon (2011) provided a model-based comparison of current generic hearing aid prescriptive methods for adults with hearing loss based on the attributes of speech intelligibility, loudness, and bandwidth. PURPOSE This study compared the National Acoustic Laboratories-Non-linear 2 (NAL-NL2) and Cambridge Method for Loudness Equalization 2-High-Frequency (CAM2) prescripti...

متن کامل

Preferred Hearing Aid Environments

Thirty-three hearing-impaired individuals were each fitted with three hearing aids. The instruments conformed to three frequency-gain prescriptions, differing by a total of 8 dB/octave, with the middle prescription derived using the MSU version 3.0 procedure. The subjects were divided into three matched groups of eleven. Each group used the fitted hearing aids in one of three everyday listening...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

دوره 7 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1996